By Sarah Gross
Organic has become a buzzword among those who are concerned about their health. But what does organic mean? What are the benefits of organic food versus conventional food? Why should students consider paying more for organic foods? This conversation has been debated heavily, but there are facts among the rhetoric that provide answers to these elusive questions.
Organic food in the US goes through strict regulations, according to Urvashi Rangan, who is director of technical policy for the Consumer’s Union. Rangan took part in a debate held on Intelligence Squared, a program broadcasted by NPR.
Rangan asserts that there are five main ways Organic food benefits consumers: Organic animals don’t eat excrement, antibiotics are not allowed, organic animals are not fed toxic heavy metals (like arsenic), synthetic pesticides are not used, and synthetic fertilizers are not allowed (i.e. human waste).
Believe it or not, the above-mentioned regulations actually are allowed to take place in conventional agriculture. Rangan states, “We feed antibiotics to animals every single day. We wouldn’t do that with humans. We wouldn’t feed humans antibiotics every day. Why do we do it in conventional agriculture?”
The daily use of antibiotics is irresponsible considering the on-going battle against antibiotic resistant bacteria (such as MRSA) that, according to the CDC killed 18,650 people in 2005. The CDC found that more people die of MRSA annually than of AIDS! (Only 16,000 people died of AIDS in the US in 2005).
One of the main arguments against Organic products is the increased price. Organic food is, on average, $1.60 for every $1.00 of a similar conventional product, according to John Krebs, who is chairman of Britain’s Food Standards Agency, who was also one of the experts debating on Intelligence Squared.
So why do organic foods cost more? Rangan explains that organic food is laborious to produce; instead of using chemicals to kill weeds, they must be physically pulled.
Another reason for the increased cost is because conventional crops, such as soy and corn, are subsidized by taxpayer money and organic products have yet to receive such subsidies.
While opponents to organic products claim that there are no significant health benefits, and that the chemicals used on conventional products do not pose health risks, there is reason to believe that this is simply not true.
Charles Benbrook, chief scientist at the Organic Center, also participated in Intelligence Squared. Benbrook links the use of certain pesticides to birth defects afflicting one in eight babies, as well as the 25% of Americans who are having difficulty conceiving. He acknowledges that there are pesticides available that are fairly safe, including one called Glyfosate.
But can a consumer really tell which products have residue from a safe pesticide versus that of an unsafe pesticide?
For students paying that additional 60 cents can sometimes be tough, considering that can almost buy a burrito at Taco Bell, but it is a wise decision to make, if possible. Organic products are heavily regulated, and are much more transparent than conventional products, allowing consumers to make an educated decision on the food they eat.







